Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs SPYM: how they differ

QQQM and SPYM hold 54% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and SPYM hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQM and SPYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQMSPYM
NVIDIA Corp8.52%8.07%
Apple Inc7.72%7.32%
Microsoft Corp5.89%5.58%
Amazon.com Inc4.36%3.76%
Alphabet Inc3.12%2.98%
Broadcom Inc2.75%2.61%
Alphabet Inc2.90%2.38%
Meta Platforms Inc3.07%2.16%
Micron Technology Inc4.90%1.68%
Tesla Inc2.92%1.56%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.65%1.25%
Intel Corp2.24%0.76%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQMOnly in SPYM
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.26%JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 1.45%
ASML Holding NV 0.69%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 1.42%
Shopify Inc 0.69%ELI LILLY + CO 1.36%
ARM Holdings PLC 0.48%EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.04%
MercadoLibre Inc 0.43%JOHNSON + JOHNSON 0.98%
PDD Holdings Inc 0.23%VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 0.93%
Nebius Group NV 0.22%MASTERCARD INC A 0.70%
Astera Labs Inc 0.22%ABBVIE INC 0.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

QQQM and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
SPYM
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isNasdaq-100S&P 500
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%1.30%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings106507

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 106 positions, with the top ten at 47.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPYM in plain words

SPYM is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or SPYM?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and SPYM returned +17.6%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or SPYM?
QQQM charges 0.15% a year and SPYM charges 1.30%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and SPYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQM and 100% of SPYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 54% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against SPYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against SPYM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-spym Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources