Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QQQM vs SMH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QQQM returned +15.2% to SMH's +56.8%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to SMH's 0.35%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QQQM and SMH

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and $71.1bn for VanEck Semiconductor ETF.

At a glance
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
+56.8%
SMH total return, 1 year
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio
0.35%
SMH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 41.6 points; QQQM is 1.6 times larger.

QQQM vs SMH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQMSMH
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+56.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Below its all-time high15.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq-100 IndexSemiconductors
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 43.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$110.4bn$71.1bn
Active share vs the S&P 50081%
Holdings
Holdings in common32%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%69%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
QQQM SMH
Return
Total return edge SMH +157.2% +494.7%
Annualized edge SMH +17.0% +34.5%
Price return edge SMH +147.9% +473.0%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQM 21.0% 32.7%
Max drawdown edge QQQM −35.0% −44.2%
Downside capture 99.8% 117.1%
Beta 1.00 1.40
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SMH 0.70 0.97
Sortino edge SMH 1.07 1.52
Treynor 0.147 0.192
Calmar edge SMH 0.49 0.78
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +12.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.62 2.95
Information ratio 0.10 0.96
Tracking error 0.4% 17.4%

Each against its own benchmark: QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; SMH against ACWI, Dec 30, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SMH returned more: +494.7% to +157.2%. QQQM swung less: 21.0% to 32.7%. QQQM fell less at its worst: −35.0% to −44.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QQQM vs SMH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQMSMHEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+157.2%+494.7%SMHPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+17.0%+34.5%SMHTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+147.9%+473.0%SMHPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.0%32.7%QQQMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.6%20.9%QQQMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.0%−44.2%QQQMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.6%197.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.8%117.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.40Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.63Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.700.97SMHReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.071.52SMHReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1470.192Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.490.78SMHAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+12.6% a yearQQQM not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.622.95Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.2% to +0.4%+4.2% to +20.9%QQQM includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.100.96Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.4%17.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

32%

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and SMH hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

32% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QQQM SMH
NVIDIA Corp 8.17% 20.15%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50% 4.67%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93% 5.56%
Broadcom Inc 2.53% 5.52%
Intel Corp 2.12% 4.10%
Applied Materials Inc 1.35% 3.92%
Lam Research Corp 1.29% 3.54%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.21% 5.48%
Marvell Technology Inc 0.92% 4.49%
Analog Devices Inc 0.89% 4.73%
KLA Corp 0.86% 3.90%
QUALCOMM Inc 0.83% 4.06%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QQQM
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.93%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.87%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.74%
Alphabet Inc 2.72%
Only in SMH
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co L 9.65%
Sk Hynix Inc 3.78%
Stmicroelectronics Nv 0.91%
On Semiconductor Corp 0.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Tracks the Nasdaq-100 Semiconductors
Total return, 1 year +15.2% +56.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.2% (QQQ) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs QQQ +43.4 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 95.7% 79.3%
Holdings 105 25
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $110.4bn $71.1bn

QQQM and SMH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6A54171524

QQQM and SMH do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index and SMH follows Semiconductors.
  2. Holdings in common. 32% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QQQM returned +15.2% and SMH +56.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 41.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM and SMH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SMH

By weight, 79% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +56.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 43.4 pts. It sits 15.1% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are QQQM and SMH in the same category?
QQQM is a stock ETF and SMH is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or SMH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +15.2% and SMH +56.8%.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or SMH?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and SMH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of QQQM and 79% of SMH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQQM against SMH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-smh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.