Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQ vs SPHQ: how they differ

QQQ and SPHQ hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

Invesco QQQ Trust and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and SPHQ hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQ and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQSPHQ
Apple Inc7.72%5.60%
Cisco Systems Inc1.88%3.51%
Costco Wholesale Corp1.78%3.85%
Lam Research Corp1.66%4.10%
Applied Materials Inc1.60%2.39%
Netflix Inc1.42%4.00%
Sandisk Corp1.11%3.36%
Texas Instruments Inc1.05%2.11%
KLA Corp1.03%2.33%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC0.86%1.54%
QUALCOMM Inc0.83%2.51%
Western Digital Corp0.71%2.65%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQOnly in SPHQ
NVIDIA Corp 8.52%Mastercard Inc 5.78%
Microsoft Corp 5.89%Visa Inc 5.68%
Micron Technology Inc 4.90%GE Vernova Inc 3.92%
Amazon.com Inc 4.36%General Electric Co 3.62%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.65%Procter & Gamble Co/The 2.86%
Alphabet Inc 3.12%Newmont Corp 1.98%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.07%Progressive Corp/The 1.38%
Tesla Inc 2.92%TJX Cos Inc/The 1.29%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

QQQ and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoInvesco
What it isNasdaq-100S&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%99.9%
Holdings105100

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 47.0%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 43.4%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +23.0% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SPHQ?
QQQ charges 0.18% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQ and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQ and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 24% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQ against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against SPHQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqq-vs-sphq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources