Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQ vs RSP: how they differ

QQQ and RSP hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

Invesco QQQ Trust and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and RSP hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQ and RSP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQRSP
DoorDash Inc0.37%0.26%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc0.36%0.26%
Airbnb Inc0.31%0.25%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc0.94%0.25%
Palo Alto Networks Inc1.23%0.25%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.69%0.25%
Microsoft Corp5.89%0.24%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.80%0.23%
Constellation Energy Corp0.46%0.23%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.58%0.23%
Automatic Data Processing Inc0.47%0.22%
Fortinet Inc0.52%0.22%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQOnly in RSP
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.26%Moderna Inc 0.58%
ASML Holding NV 0.69%Veeva Systems Inc 0.31%
Shopify Inc 0.69%Zebra Technologies Corp 0.31%
ARM Holdings PLC 0.48%Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.29%
MercadoLibre Inc 0.43%Valero Energy Corp 0.29%
PDD Holdings Inc 0.23%Charles River Laboratories International 0.28%
Nebius Group NV 0.22%Phillips 66 0.28%
Astera Labs Inc 0.22%Salesforce Inc 0.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

QQQ and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoInvesco
What it isNasdaq-100S&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.20%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%99.1%
Holdings105506

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 47.0%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or RSP?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +23.0% and RSP returned +14.8%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSP?
QQQ charges 0.18% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQ and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQ and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQ against RSP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against RSP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqq-vs-rsp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources