Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QQQ vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QQQ returned +15.2% to REMX's −19.2%, and QQQ charges 0.18% to REMX's 0.53%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QQQ and REMX

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $483.0bn for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 and $1.5bn for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.

At a glance
+15.2%
QQQ total return, 1 year
−19.2%
REMX total return, 1 year
0.18%
QQQ expense ratio
0.53%
REMX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQ costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.4 points; QQQ is far larger, $483.0bn against $1.5bn.

QQQ vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQREMX
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.2%−19.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Below its all-time high75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq-100 IndexRare earth and critical materials
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 32.6 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.53%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$483.0bn$1.5bn
Active share vs the S&P 500100%
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%61%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 833 weekly returns
QQQ REMX
Return
Total return edge QQQ +1,405.3% −68.2%
Annualized edge QQQ +18.4% −6.9%
Price return edge QQQ +1,212.5% −79.7%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQ 19.0% 35.3%
Max drawdown edge QQQ −35.1% −89.2%
Downside capture 100.2% 133.0%
Beta 1.00 1.43
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQ 0.90 −0.07
Sortino edge QQQ 1.36 −0.10
Treynor 0.145 −0.018
Calmar edge QQQ 0.53 −0.08
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year −15.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.58 −2.33
Information ratio −0.10 −0.42
Tracking error 0.4% 27.8%

Each against its own benchmark: QQQ against QQQM, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; REMX against ACWI, Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQ returned more: +1,405.3% to −68.2%. QQQ swung less: 19.0% to 35.3%. QQQ fell less at its worst: −35.1% to −89.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QQQ vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQREMXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,405.3%−68.2%QQQPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.4%−6.9%QQQTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,212.5%−79.7%QQQPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%35.3%QQQSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.6%24.5%QQQLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.1%−89.2%QQQDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.4%129.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.2%133.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.43Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.42Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.90−0.07QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.36−0.10QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.145−0.018Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.53−0.08QQQAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQMACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year−15.8% a yearQQQ not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.58−2.33Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.2%−29.0% to −2.5%QQQ includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.10−0.42Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.4%27.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 833 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and REMX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QQQ REMX
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QQQ
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.92%
Only in REMX
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile Sa 9.02%
Albemarle Corp 8.87%
China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Te 7.12%
Mp Materials Corp 6.90%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 6.35%
Pilbara Minerals Ltd 5.55%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 5.04%
Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 4.46%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Tracks the Nasdaq-100 Rare earth and critical materials
Total return, 1 year +15.2% −19.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.2% (QQQM) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs QQQM −32.6 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.53%
Already in the S&P 500 95.7% 8.6%
Holdings 103 32
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $483.0bn $1.5bn

QQQ and REMX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E96B05895E

QQQ and REMX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. QQQ follows Nasdaq-100 Index and REMX follows Rare earth and critical materials.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QQQ returned +15.2% and REMX −19.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 34.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQ and REMX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QQQ

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

REMX

By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

Questions people ask

Are QQQ and REMX in the same category?
QQQ is a stock ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or REMX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +15.2% and REMX −19.2%.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or REMX?
QQQ is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQ and REMX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of QQQ and 9% of REMX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQQ against REMX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqq-vs-remx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.