Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QBKV vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

QBKV and VTWO are measured over different days, and VTWO charges 0.06% to QBKV's 0.74%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QBKV and VTWO

Net assets: $7.4m on Oct 27, 2026 for AllianzIM U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF - Jan, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+7.6%
QBKV total return, since launch, Apr 1, 2026
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.74%
QBKV expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.68 points a year less.

QBKV vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQBKVVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 yearnot published+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Index fall to the buffer1.2%
Fund price fall to the buffer1.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksIWMRussell 2000 Index
The outcome period
Room to the cap6.4%
Buffer left, in index points5.0% of 5.0%
Days left in the period64
Period endsDec 31, 2026
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.74%0.06%
Net assets, QBKV as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$7.4m$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%

Method

Side by side

QBKV AllianzIM U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF - Jan VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 5% on IWM Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +7.6% (since launch, Apr 1, 2026) +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +12.7% (IWM) (since launch, Apr 1, 2026) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark −5.1 pts vs IWM (since launch, Apr 1, 2026) +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.74% 0.06%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 2002
Net assets, QBKV as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $7.4m $16.6bn

QBKV and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QBKV

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, IWM can fall 1.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 5.0% of the 5.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 64 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are QBKV and VTWO in the same category?
QBKV is a buffer ETF and VTWO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, QBKV or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.68 percentage points a year. That is about $68 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QBKV against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qbkv-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.