Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PWZ vs VTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

On May 31, 2026 PWZ's duration was 8.5 years and VTEC's 6.5; VTEC charges 0.06% to PWZ's 0.28%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PWZ and VTEC

Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF, and $3.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF.

At a glance
−1.5%
PWZ total return, 1 year
−0.8%
VTEC total return, 1 year
0.28%
PWZ expense ratio
0.06%
VTEC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTEC costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points.

PWZ vs VTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePWZVTEC
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.5%−0.8%
Drawdown
Below its high5.0%, high on Jul 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities IndexS&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.28%0.06%
Net assets, PWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTEC as of Sep 30, 2026$1.2bn$3.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common28%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 141 weekly returns
PWZ VTEC
Return
Total return edge VTEC +1.1% +3.7%
Annualized edge VTEC +0.4% +1.3%
Price return edge VTEC −8.2% −4.3%
Risk
Volatility edge VTEC 6.1% 4.0%
Max drawdown edge VTEC −8.5% −5.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PWZ −0.62 −0.73
Sortino edge PWZ −0.76 −0.89
Calmar edge VTEC 0.05 0.24
Reading

VTEC returned more: +3.7% to +1.1%. VTEC swung less: 4.0% to 6.1%. VTEC fell less at its worst: −5.6% to −8.5%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PWZ vs VTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePWZVTECEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1.1%+3.7%VTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+0.4%+1.3%VTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−8.2%−4.3%VTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility6.1%4.0%VTECSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation5.0%3.3%VTECLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−8.5%−5.6%VTECDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.62−0.73PWZReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.76−0.89PWZReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.050.24VTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 141 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

28%

By the books each fund has filed, PWZ and VTEC hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PWZ VTEC
California (State of) Educational Facilities Authority (Stanford University), Series 2019 V-1, RB, due May 1, 2049 0.54% 0.22%
Foothill-Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, Series 2021 A, Ref. RB, due Jan 15, 2046 0.45% 0.21%
California (State of) Educational Facilities Authority, Series 2025 A, RB, due Oct 1, 2055 0.58% 0.20%
California (State of), Series 2025, GO Bonds, due Mar 1, 2055 0.35% 0.17%
University of California, Series 2025 CC, RB, due May 15, 2053 0.36% 0.16%
State of California, Series 2026, GO Bonds, due Oct 1, 2056 0.22% 0.15%
San Francisco (City & County of), CA Airport Commission (San Francisco International Airport), Series 2017 B, RB, due May 1, 2047 0.27% 0.14%
Los Angeles Unified School District, Series 2020 RYQ, GO Bonds, due Jul 1, 2044 0.50% 0.14%
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (Election of 2016) (Green Bonds), Series 2022 D-1, GO Bonds, due Aug 1, 2052 0.37% 0.14%
Los Angeles Unified School District (Election of 2008), Series 2018 B-1, GO Bonds, due Jul 1, 2042 0.21% 0.13%
University of California, Series 2022 BK, RB, due May 15, 2052 0.39% 0.13%
San Diego Community College District, Series 2025 A-1, GO Bonds, due Aug 1, 2055 0.43% 0.13%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PWZ
State of California, Series 2005, GO Bonds, due Jun 5, 2026 0.75%
California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser Permanente), Subseries 2017 A-2, RB, due Nov 1, 2044 0.74%
California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Series 2021 A, Ref. RB, due Aug 15, 2048 0.67%
Regents of the University of California Medical Center, Series 2022 P, RB, due May 15, 2047 0.63%
Regents of the University of California Medical Center, Series 2022 P, RB, due May 15, 2053 0.53%
California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser Permanente), Subseries 2017 A-2, RB, due Nov 1, 2047 0.34%
California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Providence St. Joseph Health), Series 2016 A, Ref. RB, due Oct 1, 2047 0.29%
Palomar Community College District (Election of 2016), Series 2024 B, GO Bonds, due Aug 1, 2049 0.22%
Only in VTEC
CA REGENTS UNIV-CD, due May 15, 2036 0.49%
BAY AREA TOLL AUTH-A, due Apr 1, 2061 0.41%
LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-A, due Jul 1, 2034 0.28%
LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-A, due Jul 1, 2033 0.25%
SAN FRANCISCO ARPT-C, due May 1, 2058 0.24%
LOS ANGELES UNIF SD-A, due Jul 1, 2032 0.24%
UNIV OF CALIFORNIA CA, due May 15, 2032 0.22%
LOS ANGELES CA DEPT-A, due Jul 1, 2028 0.22%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PWZ Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF VTEC Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year −1.5% −0.8%
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.06%
Holdings 1298 3944
Net assets, PWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.2bn $3.6bn

PWZ and VTEC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-499812AF14

PWZ and VTEC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. PWZ follows ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index and VTEC follows S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
  3. Number of holdings. PWZ holds 1,298 positions and VTEC holds 3944.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PWZ

PWZ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTEC

VTEC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PWZ or VTEC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PWZ returned −1.5% and VTEC −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, PWZ or VTEC?
VTEC is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PWZ against VTEC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwz-vs-vtec

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.