Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PVAL vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PVAL returned +26.6% to XLK's +27.1%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PVAL and XLK
Net assets: $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, and $125.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLK costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points.
| Measure | PVAL | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +26.6% | +27.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Technology Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and XLK as of Oct 27, 2026 | $14.1bn | $125.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.8% | 64.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PVAL and XLK hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
21% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PVAL and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PVAL and XLK do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. PVAL follows No index, actively managed and XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index.
- Holdings in common. 21% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- Cost. PVAL charges 0.55% of assets a year and XLK 0.08%, a gap of 0.47 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.
XLK
XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PVAL or XLK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PVAL returned +26.6% and XLK +27.1%.
- Which is cheaper, PVAL or XLK?
- XLK is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PVAL against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-xlk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PVAL against XLK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-xlk
[PVAL against XLK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-xlk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.