Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PVAL vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PVAL returned +26.6% to VUSB's +3.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PVAL and VUSB

Net assets: $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, and $9.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+26.6%
PVAL total return, 1 year
+3.5%
VUSB total return, 1 year
0.55%
PVAL expense ratio
0.10%
VUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VUSB costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.1 points.

PVAL vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePVALVUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+26.6%+3.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.55%0.10%
Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026$14.1bn$9.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight91%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PVAL and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PVAL VUSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PVAL
MICROSOFT CORP 9.27%
APPLE INC 6.70%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.71%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.77%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) 3.25%
CITIGROUP INC 3.25%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 3.13%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.95%
Only in VUSB
United States Treasury Bill 2.39%
United States Treasury Bill 2.35%
MKTLIQ 2.00%
Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.89%
PNC Financial Services Group Inc 0.53%
National Bank of Canada 0.53%
Citizens Bank NA/Providence RI 0.48%
US Bancorp 0.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +26.6% +3.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.9 pts vs IWD +4.9 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.10%
Holdings 44 1344
Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026 $14.1bn $9.9bn

PVAL and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PVAL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

VUSB

VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PVAL or VUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PVAL returned +26.6% and VUSB +3.5%.
Which is cheaper, PVAL or VUSB?
VUSB is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PVAL against VUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-vusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.