Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PVAL vs VCIT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PVAL returned +26.6% to VCIT's −1.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PVAL and VCIT

Net assets: $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, and $66.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+26.6%
PVAL total return, 1 year
−1.8%
VCIT total return, 1 year
0.55%
PVAL expense ratio
0.03%
VCIT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCIT costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.4 points.

PVAL vs VCIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePVALVCIT
Return
Total return, 1 year+26.6%−1.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.55%0.03%
Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and VCIT as of Sep 30, 2026$14.1bn$66.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight91%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PVAL and VCIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PVAL VCIT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PVAL
MICROSOFT CORP 9.27%
APPLE INC 6.70%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.71%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.77%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) 3.25%
CITIGROUP INC 3.25%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 3.13%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.95%
Only in VCIT
MKTLIQ 0.58%
Amazon.com Inc 0.29%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.28%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.27%
Boeing Co 0.27%
Bank of America Corp 0.27%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.26%
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year +26.6% −1.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) −1.8% (SCHI)
Gap to its benchmark −0.9 pts vs IWD 0.0 pts vs SCHI
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.03%
Holdings 44 2340
Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and VCIT as of Sep 30, 2026 $14.1bn $66.6bn

PVAL and VCIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PVAL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

VCIT

VCIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.8% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PVAL or VCIT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PVAL returned +26.6% and VCIT −1.8%.
Which is cheaper, PVAL or VCIT?
VCIT is cheaper, by 0.52 percentage points a year. That is about $52 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PVAL against VCIT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-vcit

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.