Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs VLUE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to VLUE's +54.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and VLUE

Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $9.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+54.7%
VLUE total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.15%
VLUE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 50.7 points; PULS is 2.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

PULS vs VLUE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSVLUE
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+54.7%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Enhanced Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.8bn$9.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight97%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VLUE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS VLUE
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in VLUE
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 20.94%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.37%
GENERAL MOTORS 3.54%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 2.72%
AT&T 2.24%
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 1.95%
PFIZER 1.86%
BANK OF AMERICA 1.77%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +54.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +41.1 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Holdings 553 148
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VLUE as of Oct 28, 2026 $19.8bn $9.4bn

PULS and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS and VLUE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VLUE

VLUE tracks the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +54.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VLUE?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and VLUE +54.7%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or VLUE?
Neither: PULS and VLUE both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against VLUE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vlue

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.