Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
PULS vs SPYM: how they differ
PULS and SPYM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SPYM returned more over the year.
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and SPYM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in PULS | Only in SPYM |
|---|---|
| PGIM ETF Trust 2.38% | NVIDIA CORP 8.07% |
| GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98% | APPLE INC 7.32% |
| Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.58% |
| ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.76% |
| BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68% | ALPHABET INC CL A 2.98% |
| FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67% | BROADCOM INC 2.61% |
| BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56% | ALPHABET INC CL C 2.38% |
| BROADCOM INC 0.56% | META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 2.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | SPYM State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PGIM | State Street |
| What it is | PGIM Ultra Short Bond | S&P 500 |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.3 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 1.30% |
| Holdings | 553 | 507 |
PULS in plain words
PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
SPYM in plain words
SPYM is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SPYM?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SPYM returned +17.6%, so SPYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or SPYM?
- PULS charges 0.15% a year and SPYM charges 1.30%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PULS against SPYM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-spym Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources