Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PFFA vs VRP: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PFFA returned −3.4% to VRP's +1.6%, and VRP charges 0.50% to PFFA's 2.11%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PFFA and VRPNet assets: $2.5bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF, and $3.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF.
Pair scorecard
VRP costs 1.61 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points.
| Measure | PFFA | VRP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −3.4% | +1.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.2%, high on May 8, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | ICE Variable Rate Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 2.11% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, PFFA as of Jul 31, 2026 and VRP as of Oct 27, 2026 | $2.5bn | $3.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 22.9% | 9.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
May 25, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 439 weekly returnsPFFA returned more: +64.9% to +47.9%. VRP swung less: 12.9% to 27.3%. VRP fell less at its worst: −30.8% to −59.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | PFFA | VRP | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +64.9% | +47.9% | PFFA | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +6.1% | +4.7% | PFFA | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −25.2% | −5.6% | VRP | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 27.3% | 12.9% | VRP | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 18.6% | 9.1% | VRP | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −59.0% | −30.8% | VRP | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.25 | 0.21 | PFFA | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.37 | 0.29 | PFFA | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.10 | 0.15 | VRP | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 439 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PFFA and VRP hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
2% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PFFA and VRP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PFFA and VRP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. PFFA follows No index, actively managed and VRP follows ICE Variable Rate Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index.
- Holdings in common. 2% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and May 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PFFA returned −3.4% and VRP +1.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.0 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
PFFA
PFFA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 2.11% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 1% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 194 positions, with the top ten at 22.9%. It sat 9.2% below its high of May 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VRP
VRP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 367 positions, with the top ten at 9.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PFFA or VRP?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PFFA returned −3.4% and VRP +1.6%.
- Which is cheaper, PFFA or VRP?
- VRP is cheaper, by 1.61 percentage points a year. That is about $161 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PFFA against VRP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pffa-vs-vrp
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PFFA against VRP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pffa-vs-vrp
[PFFA against VRP (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pffa-vs-vrp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.