PEY vs SMIG: how they differ

PEY and SMIG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PEY returned +14.8% over the year. Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF.

SMIG costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.1 points; SMIG is 1.4 times larger.

PEYSMIG
Expense ratio0.68%0.60%
Net assets, PEY as of Oct 9, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026$1.1bn$1.5bn
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+9.7%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.6%42.3%
Below its high8.8%, high on Aug 26, 20266.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+14.8%
PEY total return, 1 year
+9.7%
SMIG total return, 1 year
0.68%
PEY expense ratio
0.60%
SMIG expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PEY and SMIG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding PEY SMIG
Only in PEY
Perrigo Co PLC 3.71%
Flowers Foods Inc 3.67%
Universal Corp/VA 3.25%
Edison International 3.10%
Altria Group Inc 3.09%
Pfizer Inc 2.79%
United Parcel Service Inc 2.69%
Best Buy Co Inc 2.49%
Only in SMIG
Silicon Motion Technology Corp 6.66%
Targa Resources Corp 4.89%
Snap-on Inc 4.70%
Victory Capital Holdings Inc 4.30%
DT Midstream Inc 4.19%
Hubbell Inc 4.01%
Gildan Activewear Inc 3.78%
Packaging Corp of America 3.30%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF
SMIG
Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +14.8% +9.7%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.5 pts −7.6 pts
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.60%
Already in the S&P 500 50.6% 35.4%
Holdings 52 38
Net assets, PEY as of Oct 9, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026 $1.1bn $1.5bn

PEY and SMIG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

PEY in plain words

PEY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%. It sat 8.8% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

SMIG in plain words

SMIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 35% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 38 positions, with the top ten at 42.3%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PEY or SMIG?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PEY returned +14.8% and SMIG +9.7%.
Which is cheaper, PEY or SMIG?
SMIG is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $8. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PEY and SMIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 51% of PEY and 35% of SMIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, PEY against SMIG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pey-vs-smig

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.