EMLP vs PEY: how they differ

EMLP and PEY hold 0% of their weight in the same names. First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund and Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF.

PEY costs 0.27 points a year less; both returned +14.8% over a year; EMLP is 3.8 times larger.

EMLPPEY
Expense ratio0.95%0.68%
Net assets$4.1bn$1.1bn
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+14.8%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.7%29.6%
Below its high4.8%, high on Jul 23, 20268.8%, high on Aug 26, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+14.8%
EMLP total return, 1 year
+14.8%
PEY total return, 1 year
0.95%
EMLP expense ratio
0.68%
PEY expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMLP and PEY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding EMLP PEY
Only in EMLP
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. 8.62%
Energy Transfer LP 7.58%
MPLX LP 4.26%
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (Class A) 3.91%
Kinder Morgan, Inc. 3.88%
National Fuel Gas Company 3.88%
PPL Corporation 2.88%
The Southern Company 2.83%
Only in PEY
Perrigo Co PLC 3.71%
Flowers Foods Inc 3.67%
Universal Corp/VA 3.25%
Edison International 3.10%
Altria Group Inc 3.09%
Pfizer Inc 2.79%
United Parcel Service Inc 2.69%
Best Buy Co Inc 2.49%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.5 pts −2.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.68%
Already in the S&P 500 42.9% 50.6%
Holdings 58 52
Net assets $4.1bn $1.1bn

EMLP and PEY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EMLP in plain words

EMLP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 58 positions, with the top ten at 42.7%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Jul 23, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

PEY in plain words

PEY tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%. It sat 8.8% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMLP or PEY?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMLP returned +14.8% and PEY +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, EMLP or PEY?
PEY is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $27. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMLP and PEY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 43% of EMLP and 51% of PEY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, EMLP against PEY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-pey

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.