EMLP vs FTXR: how they differ
EMLP and FTXR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FTXR returned +21.2% over the year. First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund and First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF.
FTXR costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.4 points; EMLP is 4.1 times larger.
| EMLP | FTXR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.60% |
| Net assets | $4.1bn | $999m |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +21.2% |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.7% | 58.3% |
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Jul 23, 2026 | 9.0%, high on Aug 4, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EMLP and FTXR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
EMLP and FTXR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EMLP in plain words
EMLP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 58 positions, with the top ten at 42.7%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Jul 23, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
FTXR in plain words
FTXR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 73% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 42 positions, with the top ten at 58.3%. It sat 9.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMLP or FTXR?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMLP returned +14.8% and FTXR +21.2%.
- Which is cheaper, EMLP or FTXR?
- FTXR is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $35. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, EMLP against FTXR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-ftxr
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). EMLP against FTXR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-ftxr
[EMLP against FTXR (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-ftxr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.