Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs VO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to VO's +12.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and VO

Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $103.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+12.8%
VO total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.03%
VO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VO costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 42.8 points.

PDBC vs VO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCVO
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+12.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMorningstar US Mid Cap Index (formerly CRSP US Mid Cap Index)
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.03%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VO as of Sep 30, 2026$8.0bn$103.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight91%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund9.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and VO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC VO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in VO
Cloudflare Inc 1.11%
Valero Energy Corp 1.10%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.10%
Phillips 66 1.01%
Quanta Services Inc 0.95%
Vertiv Holdings Co 0.92%
Datadog Inc 0.91%
Howmet Aerospace Inc 0.89%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF VO Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Mid-Cap
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +12.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.03%
Holdings 1 273
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VO as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.0bn $103.4bn

PDBC and VO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

VO

VO tracks an index of Mid-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 273 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or VO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and VO +12.8%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or VO?
VO is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against VO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-vo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.