Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or SLV?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +12.7% and SLV +14.9%.

Which is cheaper, ONEQ or SLV?

ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

ONEQ vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

ONEQ is an equity index fund and SLV a commodity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SLV returned +14.9% against +12.7%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ONEQ and SLV

Net assets: $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, and $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Silver Trust.

ONEQ on its own →SLV on its own →

At a glance

+12.7%

ONEQ total return, 1 year

+14.9%

SLV total return, 1 year

0.21%

ONEQ expense ratio

0.50%

SLV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ONEQ costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.2 points; SLV is 2.8 times larger.

ONEQ vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	ONEQ	SLV
Return
Measure	ONEQ	SLV
Total return, 1 year	+12.7%	+14.9%
Drawdown
Measure	ONEQ	SLV
Below its high	3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026	53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	ONEQ	SLV
What it tracks	Nasdaq Composite Index	Silver
Cost and size
Measure	ONEQ	SLV
Expense ratio	0.21%	0.50%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026	$10.9bn	$30.0bn
Holdings
Measure	ONEQ	SLV
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight	85%
Holdings dated	Aug 31, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	56.0%

Method

Side by side

ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF SLV iShares Silver Trust

Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer Fidelity iShares

What it is Tracks the Nasdaq Composite Holds silver

Total return, 1 year +12.7% +14.9%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +15.0% (SIVR)

Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs SIVR

Expense ratio 0.21% 0.50%

Holdings 1026 not counted

Net assets, ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 and SLV as of Oct 28, 2026 $10.9bn $26.9bn

ONEQ and SLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

ONEQ

ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SLV

Its expense ratio is 0.50% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SLV holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or SLV?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +12.7% and SLV +14.9%.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or SLV?: ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

GLDM vs ONEQ GLD vs ONEQ ONEQ vs SIVR ONEQ vs USO FBCG vs SLV SLV vs VOOG SLV vs VONG SLV vs XOVR

Where to next

ONEQ on its own →SLV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →ONEQ dividend history →ONEQ holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ONEQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ONEQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Fidelity website ↗

iShares page for SLV ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ONEQ against SLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-slv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.