NOBL vs REGL: how they differ

NOBL and REGL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NOBL returned +9.8% over the year. ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

NOBL costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.8 points; NOBL is 6.7 times larger.

NOBLREGL
Expense ratio0.35%0.40%
Net assets$11.2bn$1.7bn
Total return, 1 year+9.8%+6.0%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund16.7%17.5%
Below its high6.3%, high on Aug 24, 20268.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+9.8%
NOBL total return, 1 year
+6.0%
REGL total return, 1 year
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio
0.40%
REGL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and REGL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding NOBL REGL
Only in NOBL
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.73%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.71%
NORDSON CORP 1.67%
FASTENAL CO 1.66%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.65%
TARGET CORP 1.65%
CHEVRON CORP 1.63%
Only in REGL
ROYAL GOLD INC 1.93%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.79%
GRACO INC 1.74%
SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY 1.74%
MSA SAFETY INC 1.73%
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS 1.72%
RELIANCE INC 1.71%
UNUM GROUP 1.71%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +9.8% +6.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −7.4 pts −11.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.40%
Already in the S&P 500 99.7% 0.0%
Holdings 69 65
Net assets $11.2bn $1.7bn

NOBL and REGL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

REGL in plain words

REGL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 65 positions, with the top ten at 17.5%. It sat 8.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or REGL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.8% and REGL +6.0%.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or REGL?
NOBL is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $5. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NOBL and REGL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of NOBL and 0% of REGL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, NOBL against REGL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nobl-vs-regl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.