Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MUB vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MUB returned −0.4% to XLG's +6.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MUB and XLG

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $54.1bn for iShares National Muni Bond ETF and $11.9bn for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.05%
MUB expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.8 points; MUB is 4.5 times larger.

MUB vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMUBXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+6.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksICE AMT-Free US National Municipal IndexS&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.20%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$54.1bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight98%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MUB XLG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Only in XLG
NVIDIA Corp 12.54%
Apple Inc 12.04%
Microsoft Corp 9.38%
Amazon.com Inc 5.91%
Alphabet Inc 4.47%
Broadcom Inc 3.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of National Muni Bond Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.20%
Holdings 7873 53
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $54.1bn $11.9bn

MUB and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MUB and XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned −0.4% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, MUB or XLG?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MUB against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.