Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MUB vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MUB returned −0.4% to VTWO's +14.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MUB and VTWO

Net assets: $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.05%
MUB expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.7 points; MUB is 2.8 times larger.

MUB vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMUBVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE AMT-Free US National Municipal IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$46.6bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and VTWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MUB VTWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Glaukos Corp 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of National Muni Bond Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.06%
Holdings 7873 2002
Net assets, MUB as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $54.1bn $16.6bn

MUB and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MUB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned −0.4% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, MUB or VTWO?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MUB against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.