Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MUB vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MUB returned −0.4% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MUB and VPL

Net assets: $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF, and $9.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.05%
MUB expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.2 points; MUB is 5.2 times larger.

MUB vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMUBVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE AMT-Free US National Municipal IndexFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.07%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$46.6bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MUB VPL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of National Muni Bond Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +24.8%
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.07%
Holdings 7873 2343
Net assets, MUB as of Oct 27, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 $54.1bn $9.0bn

MUB and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MUB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned −0.4% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, MUB or VPL?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MUB against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.