Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MUB vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MUB returned −0.4% to VHT's +25.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MUB and VHT

Net assets: $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF, and $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
+25.0%
VHT total return, 1 year
0.05%
MUB expense ratio
0.09%
VHT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.4 points; MUB is 2.4 times larger.

MUB vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMUBVHT
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+25.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksICE AMT-Free US National Municipal IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$46.6bn$19.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight86%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and VHT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MUB VHT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Only in VHT
Eli Lilly & Co 12.95%
Johnson & Johnson 8.79%
AbbVie Inc 6.46%
Merck & Co Inc 5.02%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 4.66%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.51%
Amgen Inc 3.18%
Gilead Sciences Inc 2.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of National Muni Bond Tracks an index of Health Care
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +25.0%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +25.4% (FHLC)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.4 pts vs FHLC
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.09%
Holdings 7873 414
Net assets, MUB as of Oct 27, 2026 and VHT as of Sep 30, 2026 $54.1bn $19.1bn

MUB and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MUB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

VHT

VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or VHT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned −0.4% and VHT +25.0%.
Which is cheaper, MUB or VHT?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MUB against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-vht

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.