Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MTUM vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to URTH's +13.1%; 20% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MTUM and URTH

Net assets: $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
+13.1%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MTUM costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.3 points; MTUM is 2.1 times larger.

MTUM vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMURTH
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexMSCI World Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$18.7bn$8.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common20%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%27.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
MTUM URTH
Return
Total return edge MTUM +554.7% +330.5%
Annualized edge MTUM +14.9% +11.4%
Price return edge MTUM +459.1% +236.3%
Risk
Volatility edge URTH 19.0% 15.9%
Max drawdown edge MTUM (slight) −31.9% −32.7%
Downside capture 101.7% 96.5%
Beta 1.02 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MTUM 0.73 0.64
Sortino edge MTUM 1.07 0.91
Treynor 0.135 0.109
Calmar edge MTUM 0.47 0.35
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year +0.9% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 0.79
Information ratio 0.17 0.16
Tracking error 9.3% 4.5%

Each against its own benchmark: MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; URTH against ACWI, Jan 20, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MTUM returned more: +554.7% to +330.5%. URTH swung less: 15.9% to 19.0%. MTUM fell slightly less at its worst: −31.9% to −32.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MTUM vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMURTHEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+554.7%+330.5%MTUMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+11.4%MTUMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+459.1%+236.3%MTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%15.9%URTHSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.0%11.2%URTHLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.9%−32.7%MTUM (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture106.2%96.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.7%96.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.020.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.64MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.070.91MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1350.109Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.35MTUMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year+0.9% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.530.79Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.7% to +6.3%−1.4% to +3.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.170.16Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.3%4.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

20%

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and URTH hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

20% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MTUM URTH
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62% 2.07%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.07% 1.62%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00% 1.15%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06% 1.00%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96% 0.82%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45% 0.71%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64% 0.48%
CHEVRON 1.65% 0.46%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92% 0.45%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 2.22% 0.41%
COCA-COLA 1.98% 0.39%
MERCK & CO INC 1.81% 0.38%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MTUM
Only in URTH
APPLE 5.60%
NVIDIA 5.50%
MICROSOFT 4.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.69%
BROADCOM INC 1.70%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.49%
TESLA INC 1.28%
ELI LILLY 1.13%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF URTH iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark +4.8 pts vs MLRG −0.3 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 93.2% 69.1%
Holdings 126 1254
Net assets, MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 and URTH as of Oct 28, 2026 $18.7bn $8.9bn

MTUM and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-D8CCD4BBD5

MTUM and URTH do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and URTH follows MSCI World Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 20% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and URTH +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM and URTH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

URTH

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or URTH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and URTH +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or URTH?
MTUM is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of MTUM and 69% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MTUM against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-urth

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.