Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MTUM vs SPSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to SPSB's +2.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MTUM and SPSB

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and $11.3bn for State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
+2.2%
SPSB total return, 1 year
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio
0.04%
SPSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPSB costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.2 points; MTUM is 1.7 times larger.

MTUM vs SPSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMSPSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+2.2%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexBloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Corporate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$18.7bn$11.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight93%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
MTUM SPSB
Return
Total return edge MTUM +554.7% +35.7%
Annualized edge MTUM +14.9% +2.3%
Price return edge MTUM +459.1% −3.7%
Risk
Volatility edge SPSB 19.0% 3.2%
Max drawdown edge SPSB −31.9% −9.9%
Downside capture 101.7% 20.4%
Beta 1.02 0.39
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MTUM 0.73 0.13
Sortino edge MTUM 1.07 0.19
Treynor 0.135 0.020
Calmar edge MTUM 0.47 0.23
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year +0.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 0.78
Information ratio 0.17 −0.03
Tracking error 9.3% 3.6%

Each against its own benchmark: MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SPSB against AGG, Dec 24, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MTUM returned more: +554.7% to +35.7%. SPSB swung less: 3.2% to 19.0%. SPSB fell less at its worst: −9.9% to −31.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MTUM vs SPSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMSPSBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+554.7%+35.7%MTUMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+2.3%MTUMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+459.1%−3.7%MTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%3.2%SPSBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.0%2.3%SPSBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.9%−9.9%SPSBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture106.2%30.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.7%20.4%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.020.39Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.36Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.13MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.070.19MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1350.020Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.23MTUMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGAGGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year+0.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.530.78Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.7% to +6.3%−0.7% to +1.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.17−0.03Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.3%3.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and SPSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MTUM SPSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MTUM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%
Only in SPSB
SALESFORCE INC SR UNSECURED 03/29 4.65 0.66%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA COMPANY GUAR 10/28 3 0.47%
PFIZER INVESTMENT ENTER COMPANY GUAR 05/28 4.45 0.45%
AMAZON.COM INC SR UNSECURED 03/29 4 0.45%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP SR UNSECURED 12/28 VAR 0.45%
NVIDIA CORP SR UNSECURED 06/29 4.35 0.43%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC SR UNSECURED 05/29 VAR 0.38%
ORACLE CORP SR UNSECURED 02/29 4.55 0.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF SPSB State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor Tracks an index of Short Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +2.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +4.8 pts vs MLRG +3.6 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.04%
Holdings 126 1684
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $18.7bn $11.3bn

MTUM and SPSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7B036C2D1A

MTUM and SPSB do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and SPSB follows Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Corporate Bond Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and SPSB +2.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM and SPSB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPSB

SPSB tracks an index of Short Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.2% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SPSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and SPSB +2.2%.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or SPSB?
SPSB is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MTUM against SPSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-spsb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.