Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MOAT vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MOAT returned +10.3% to XLI's +10.2%; 6% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MOAT and XLI

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.6bn for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and $30.8bn for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
+10.2%
XLI total return, 1 year
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio
0.08%
XLI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLI costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; XLI is 2.7 times larger.

MOAT vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATXLI
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.3%+10.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 27, 20269.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar Wide Moat Focus IndexIndustrial Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.46%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.6bn$30.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%37.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 4, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 755 weekly returns
MOAT XLI
Return
Total return edge MOAT +559.2% +490.2%
Annualized edge MOAT (slight) +13.9% +13.0%
Price return edge MOAT +453.0% +353.5%
Risk
Volatility edge MOAT (slight) 17.1% 18.5%
Max drawdown edge MOAT −30.8% −39.3%
Downside capture 100.0% 102.2%
Beta 0.98 1.03
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MOAT 0.74 0.66
Sortino edge MOAT 1.10 0.96
Treynor 0.130 0.087
Calmar edge MOAT 0.45 0.33
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.06 0.35
Information ratio −0.05 0.10
Tracking error 7.6% 9.4%

Each against its own benchmark: MOAT against VOO, May 4, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026; XLI against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MOAT returned more: +559.2% to +490.2%. MOAT swung slightly less: 17.1% to 18.5%. MOAT fell less at its worst: −30.8% to −39.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MOAT vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATXLIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+559.2%+490.2%MOATPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.9%+13.0%MOAT (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+453.0%+353.5%MOATPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.1%18.5%MOAT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.6%12.7%MOAT (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.8%−39.3%MOATDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.2%105.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%102.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.981.03Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.810.79Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.66MOATReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.100.96MOATReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1300.087Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.450.33MOATAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.060.35Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.0% to +3.8%−2.9% to +4.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.050.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.6%9.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 755 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

6%

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and XLI hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

6% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MOAT XLI
Lockheed Martin Corp 1.47% 2.37%
Northrop Grumman Corp 1.18% 1.38%
Transdigm Group Inc 1.21% 1.17%
Otis Worldwide Corp 2.53% 0.53%
Copart Inc 2.15% 0.46%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65% 0.38%
Masco Corp 1.26% 0.28%
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc 2.34% 0.21%
Rollins Inc 1.18% 0.19%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Microsoft Corp 2.81%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc 2.49%
Only in XLI
CATERPILLAR INC 6.14%
GENERAL ELECTRIC 5.79%
RTX CORP 4.91%
GE VERNOVA INC 4.47%
UNION PACIFIC CORP 3.34%
DEERE + CO 3.01%
EATON CORP PLC 2.79%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF XLI State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Tracks an index of Industrials
Total return, 1 year +10.3% +10.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark −3.4 pts vs VOO −3.4 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.46% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 91.6% 99.9%
Holdings 54 84
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $11.6bn $30.8bn

MOAT and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-DCB0725B01

MOAT and XLI do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MOAT follows Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index and XLI follows Industrial Select Sector Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 6% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. Cost. MOAT charges 0.46% of assets a year and XLI 0.08%, a gap of 0.38 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MOAT and XLI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLI

XLI tracks an index of Industrials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 84 positions, with the top ten at 37.8%. It sat 9.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or XLI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +10.3% and XLI +10.2%.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or XLI?
XLI is cheaper, by 0.38 percentage points a year. That is about $38 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MOAT against XLI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-xli

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.