Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MOAT vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MOAT returned +10.3% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MOAT and PULS

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.6bn for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio
0.15%
PULS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PULS costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points; PULS is 1.7 times larger.

MOAT vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATPULS
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.3%+4.0%
Drawdown
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar Wide Moat Focus IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.46%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.6bn$19.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returns
MOAT PULS
Return
Total return edge MOAT +197.4% +32.2%
Annualized edge MOAT +13.6% +3.3%
Price return edge MOAT +167.9% −0.9%
Risk
Volatility edge PULS 19.4% 1.9%
Max drawdown edge PULS −30.8% −5.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MOAT 0.61 0.27
Sortino edge MOAT 0.89 0.32
Calmar edge PULS 0.44 0.57
Reading

MOAT returned more: +197.4% to +32.2%. PULS swung less: 1.9% to 19.4%. PULS fell less at its worst: −5.9% to −30.8%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MOAT vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATPULSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.4%+32.2%MOATPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.6%+3.3%MOATTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+167.9%−0.9%MOATPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.4%1.9%PULSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.3%1.6%PULSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.8%−5.9%PULSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.610.27MOATReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.890.32MOATReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.440.57PULSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MOAT PULS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Microsoft Corp 2.81%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer VanEck PGIM
What it is Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +10.3% +4.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −3.4 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.46% 0.15%
Holdings 54 553
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $11.6bn $19.8bn

MOAT and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MOAT and PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or PULS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +10.3% and PULS +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or PULS?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MOAT against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-puls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.