Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to RSP's +16.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and RSP

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $99.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+16.0%
RSP total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.20%
RSP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

RSP costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.8 points.

MINT vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTRSP
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+16.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Equal Weight Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.20%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and RSP as of Oct 27, 2026$16.4bn$99.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund2.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and RSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT RSP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in RSP
Moderna Inc 0.30%
PTC Inc 0.30%
Everpure Inc 0.28%
Illumina Inc 0.27%
Accenture PLC 0.27%
Hasbro Inc 0.26%
Mettler-Toledo International Inc 0.26%
Revvity Inc 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO Invesco
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +16.0%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +2.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.20%
Holdings 977 508
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and RSP as of Oct 27, 2026 $16.4bn $99.8bn

MINT and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

RSP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

RSP

RSP tracks the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 2.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or RSP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and RSP +16.0%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or RSP?
RSP is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against RSP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-rsp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.