Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs PVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to PVAL's +26.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and PVAL

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+26.6%
PVAL total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.55%
PVAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MINT costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.4 points.

MINT vs PVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTPVAL
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+26.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.55%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026$16.4bn$14.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight91%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and PVAL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT PVAL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in PVAL
MICROSOFT CORP 9.27%
APPLE INC 6.70%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.71%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.77%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) 3.25%
CITIGROUP INC 3.25%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 3.13%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.95%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO Putnam
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +26.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +27.5% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.9 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.55%
Holdings 977 44
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 $16.4bn $14.1bn

MINT and PVAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

PVAL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or PVAL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and PVAL +26.6%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or PVAL?
MINT is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against PVAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-pval

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.