Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MGK vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MGK returned +7.8% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 64% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MGK and ONEQ
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $34.9bn for Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF and $10.9bn for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
MGK costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.9 points; MGK is 3.2 times larger.
| Measure | MGK | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.8% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morningstar US Mega Cap Growth Index | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $34.9bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 64% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64.5% | 56.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MGK and ONEQ hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
64% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MGK and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MGK and ONEQ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. MGK follows Morningstar US Mega Cap Growth Index and ONEQ follows Nasdaq Composite Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MGK returned +7.8% and ONEQ +12.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.9 points.
- Number of holdings. MGK holds 54 positions and ONEQ holds 1026.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MGK
MGK tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MGK or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +7.8% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, MGK or ONEQ?
- MGK is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MGK against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgk-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MGK against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgk-vs-oneq
[MGK against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgk-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.