Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MBB vs VUSB: how they differ
MBB and VUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VUSB returned more over the year.
iShares MBS ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MBB and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MBB | Only in VUSB |
|---|---|
| BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 7.26% | United States Treasury Bill 4.24% |
| GNMA2 SF 30YR 0.09% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.68% |
| GNMA II 30YR SF - JUMBO-CONFORMING 0.08% | PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 0.59% |
| GNMA2 SINGLE FAMILY 30YR 0.04% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.53% |
| GNMA II 30YR 0.03% | Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.52% |
| GNMA2 30YR TBA(REG C) 0.03% | US Bancorp 0.51% |
| UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.03% | Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.50% |
| FNMA 30YR UMBS MEGA REMIC SUPER 0.02% | Truist Bank 0.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| MBB iShares MBS ETF | VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Mbs | Ultra-Short Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.1% | +3.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −17.6 pts | −13.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.10% |
| Holdings | 2599 | 1281 |
MBB in plain words
MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VUSB in plain words
VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MBB or VUSB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.1% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so VUSB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MBB or VUSB?
- MBB charges 0.04% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MBB against VUSB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-vusb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources