Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MAGS vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to XLV's +25.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGS and XLV

Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $47.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
+25.6%
XLV total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.08%
XLV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLV costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.8 points; XLV is 8.5 times larger.

MAGS vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSXLV
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.8%+25.6%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedHealth Care Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.5bn$47.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%60.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returns
MAGS XLV
Return
Total return edge MAGS +189.1% +41.5%
Annualized edge MAGS +35.2% +10.4%
Price return edge MAGS +181.4% +33.5%
Risk
Volatility edge XLV 24.0% 14.6%
Max drawdown edge XLV −26.6% −16.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MAGS 1.19 0.43
Sortino edge MAGS 1.97 0.63
Calmar edge MAGS 1.33 0.64
Reading

MAGS returned more: +189.1% to +41.5%. XLV swung less: 14.6% to 24.0%. XLV fell less at its worst: −16.1% to −26.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MAGS vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSXLVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+189.1%+41.5%MAGSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+35.2%+10.4%MAGSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+181.4%+33.5%MAGSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.0%14.6%XLVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.5%10.1%XLVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−26.6%−16.1%XLVDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.190.43MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.970.63MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.330.64MAGSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XLV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGS XLV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Only in XLV
ELI LILLY + CO 15.77%
JOHNSON + JOHNSON 9.96%
ABBVIE INC 7.78%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 5.66%
MERCK + CO. INC. 5.38%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 3.94%
AMGEN INC 3.72%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC 3.03%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Health care
Total return, 1 year +5.8% +25.6%
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 22.5% 99.7%
Holdings 8 62
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLV as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.5bn $47.0bn

MAGS and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

MAGS and XLV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLV

XLV tracks an index of Health care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 62 positions, with the top ten at 60.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XLV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and XLV +25.6%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or XLV?
XLV is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of MAGS and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against XLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-xlv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.