Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MAGS vs XLU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to XLU's −3.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGS and XLU

Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $23.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
−3.0%
XLU total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.08%
XLU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLU costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.8 points; XLU is 4.3 times larger.

MAGS vs XLU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSXLU
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.8%−3.0%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 20269.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedUtilities Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.5bn$23.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%58.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XLU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGS XLU
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Only in XLU
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 12.76%
SOUTHERN CO 7.91%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 7.22%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY 6.33%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 5.26%
DOMINION ENERGY INC 4.26%
SEMPRA 4.12%
ENTERGY CORP 3.75%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Utilities
Total return, 1 year +5.8% −3.0%
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 22.5% 99.7%
Holdings 8 32
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLU as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.5bn $23.9bn

MAGS and XLU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MAGS and XLU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLU

XLU tracks an index of Utilities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 58.7%. It sat 9.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XLU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and XLU −3.0%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or XLU?
XLU is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and XLU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of MAGS and 100% of XLU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against XLU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-xlu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.