Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MAGS vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to XLG's +6.4%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGS and XLG

Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $11.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLG costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points; XLG is 2.2 times larger.

MAGS vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.8%+6.4%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.20%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.5bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returns
MAGS XLG
Return
Total return edge MAGS +189.1% +104.4%
Annualized edge MAGS +35.2% +22.5%
Price return edge MAGS +181.4% +98.9%
Risk
Volatility edge XLG 24.0% 16.0%
Max drawdown edge XLG −26.6% −19.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MAGS 1.19 1.06
Sortino edge MAGS 1.97 1.68
Calmar edge MAGS 1.33 1.17
Reading

MAGS returned more: +189.1% to +104.4%. XLG swung less: 16.0% to 24.0%. XLG fell less at its worst: −19.3% to −26.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MAGS vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSXLGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+189.1%+104.4%MAGSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+35.2%+22.5%MAGSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+181.4%+98.9%MAGSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.0%16.0%XLGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.5%10.1%XLGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−26.6%−19.3%XLGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.191.06MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.971.68MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.331.17MAGSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

22%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XLG hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

22% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGS XLG
NVIDIA Corp 3.52% 12.54%
Apple Inc 3.49% 12.04%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48% 5.91%
Microsoft Corp 3.07% 9.38%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04% 3.25%
Tesla Inc 3.45% 2.73%
Alphabet Inc 2.45% 4.47%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
Only in XLG
Broadcom Inc 3.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.58%
Micron Technology Inc 2.49%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.44%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.40%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.17%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.13%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.76%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +5.8% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 22.5% 98.4%
Holdings 8 53
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.5bn $11.9bn

MAGS and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

MAGS and XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or XLG?
XLG is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of MAGS and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.