Which returned more over the last year, LQD or ONEQ?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or ONEQ?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs ONEQ: how they differ

LQD and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions LQD and ONEQ both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	LQD	ONEQ
ARCH CAPITAL GROUP LTD	0.02%	0.07%
ROYALTY PHARMA PLC	0.02%	0.05%

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in LQD	Only in ONEQ
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%	NVIDIA CORP 11.24%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%	APPLE INC 10.04%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%	MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%	AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	ALPHABET INC 4.85%
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%	BROADCOM INC 4.64%
MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%	ALPHABET INC 4.48%
CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%	TESLA INC 3.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

LQD and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Fidelity
What it is	US investment grade bonds	Nasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	+3.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.21%
Holdings	3149	1022

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or ONEQ?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or ONEQ?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against ONEQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-oneq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources