Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

LFGY vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, LFGY returned −23.0% to VOO's +13.7%, and VOO charges 0.03% to LFGY's 1.02%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LFGY and VOO

Net assets: $68m on Oct 27, 2026 for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF, and $1.0tn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
−23.0%
LFGY total return, 1 year
+13.7%
VOO total return, 1 year
1.02%
LFGY expense ratio
0.03%
VOO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VOO costs 0.99 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 36.7 points.

LFGY vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureLFGYVOO
Return
Total return, 1 year−23.0%+13.7%
Price change, 1 yearfell 55.8%rose 12.4%
Latest payout, annualized39.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBenchmark: S&P 500, measured through SPYS&P 500 Index
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 36.6 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.02%0.03%
Net assets, LFGY as of Oct 27, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026$68m$1.0tn
Holdings
Holdings in common7%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jan 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026 · 91 weekly returns
LFGY VOO
Return
Total return edge VOO −16.6% +27.6%
Annualized edge VOO −9.8% +14.9%
Price return edge VOO −70.4% +25.0%
Risk
Volatility edge VOO 34.3% 15.0%
Max drawdown edge VOO −30.2% −16.7%
Downside capture 137.8% 99.9%
Beta 1.32 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VOO −0.25 0.74
Sortino edge VOO −0.34 1.11
Treynor −0.064 0.134
Calmar edge VOO −0.33 0.90
Against the benchmark
Alpha −23.0% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.08 0.51
Information ratio −0.69 0.02
Tracking error 28.3% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: LFGY against SPY, Jan 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026; VOO against IVV, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VOO returned more: +27.6% to −16.6%. VOO swung less: 15.0% to 34.3%. VOO fell less at its worst: −16.7% to −30.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: LFGY vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureLFGYVOOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−16.6%+27.6%VOOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized−9.8%+14.9%VOOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−70.4%+25.0%VOOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility34.3%15.0%VOOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation25.0%10.0%VOOLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.2%−16.7%VOODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.9%99.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture137.8%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.321.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.341.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.250.74VOOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.341.11VOOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor−0.0640.134Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar−0.330.90VOOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−23.0% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.080.51Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−65.3% to +19.3%−0.1% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.690.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error28.3%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 91 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

7%

By the books each fund has filed, LFGY and VOO hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

7% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first LFGY VOO
NVIDIA Corp 6.45% 8.40%
Coinbase Global Inc 4.01% 0.06%
Block Inc 6.21% 0.06%
PayPal Holdings Inc 4.46% 0.06%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in LFGY
Opera Ltd 6.05%
Strategy Inc 4.85%
Galaxy Digital Inc 4.70%
HUT 8 CORP 3.85%
Riot Platforms Inc 3.79%
MercadoLibre Inc 3.73%
BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc 3.63%
Circle Internet Group Inc 3.57%
Only in VOO
Apple Inc 7.39%
Microsoft Corp 5.79%
Amazon.com Inc 3.72%
Alphabet Inc 3.07%
Broadcom Inc 2.54%
Alphabet Inc 2.46%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.43%
Micron Technology Inc 1.83%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Income ETF Stock ETF
What it is synthetic covered call, vs SPY Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year −23.0% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (SPY) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −36.6 pts vs SPY 0.0 pts vs IVV
Cash paid, 1 year 35.7% not an income fund
Expense ratio 1.02% 0.03%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 507
Net assets, LFGY as of Oct 27, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026 $68m $1.0tn

LFGY and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-AED3CCF308

LFGY and VOO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. LFGY is measured against S&P 500 through SPY and VOO follows S&P 500 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 7% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 28, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 LFGY returned −23.0% and VOO +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 36.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

LFGY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LFGY

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, LFGY paid 35.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 55.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −23.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 36.6 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 39.6%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

VOO

VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%.

Questions people ask

Are LFGY and VOO in the same category?
LFGY is an option-income ETF and VOO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, LFGY or VOO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LFGY returned −23.0% and VOO +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, LFGY or VOO?
VOO is cheaper, by 0.99 percentage points a year. That is about $99 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LFGY against VOO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lfgy-vs-voo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.