Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

KWEB vs VTI: how they differ

Over the year VTI returned more, +17.2% against −36.0%, and VTI charges 0.03% against 0.69%.

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and VTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in KWEBOnly in VTI
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 10.25%NVIDIA Corp 6.37%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.61%Apple Inc 5.88%
PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.11%Microsoft Corp 3.84%
MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.32%Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
NETEASE INC 6.25%Alphabet Inc 2.90%
LENOVO GROUP LTD 5.56%Broadcom Inc 2.48%
KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.41%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
JD.COM INC-CLASS A 3.94%Micron Technology Inc 1.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

KWEB and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerKraneSharesVanguard
What it isInternet and e-commerceUS total market
Total return, 1 year−36.0%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−53.5 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.69%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%88.3%
Holdings453531

KWEB in plain words

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned −36.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 53.5 pts. It sits 71.5% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, KWEB or VTI?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KWEB returned −36.0% and VTI returned +17.2%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, KWEB or VTI?
KWEB charges 0.69% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do KWEB and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of KWEB and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are KWEB and VTI the same kind of fund?
No. KWEB is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KWEB against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against VTI, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kweb-vs-vti Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources