Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

KRE vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, KRE returned +21.2% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KRE and MINT

Net assets: $4.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
+21.2%
KRE total return, 1 year
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
0.35%
KRE expense ratio
0.36%
MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

KRE costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.0 points.

KRE vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureKREMINT
Return
Total return, 1 year+21.2%+4.2%
Drawdown
Below its high6.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P Regional Banks Select Industry IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.36%
Net assets, KRE as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026$4.2bn$16.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight7%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, KRE and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KRE MINT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KRE
GLACIER BANCORP INC 1.20%
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS 1.17%
BANK OZK 1.17%
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM INC 1.17%
EASTERN BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC 1.16%
UNITED BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP 1.15%
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

KRE State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P Regional Banking Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +21.2% +4.2%
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.36%
Holdings 167 977
Net assets, KRE as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 $4.2bn $16.4bn

KRE and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

KRE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KRE

KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 167 positions, with the top ten at 11.6%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, KRE or MINT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KRE returned +21.2% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, KRE or MINT?
KRE is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KRE against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kre-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.