Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

JNK vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

JNK's duration was 3.4 years on Jun 30, 2026 and PULS's 0.7 on May 29, 2026; PULS charges 0.15% to JNK's 0.40%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JNK and PULS

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $5.9bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF and $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+1.7%
JNK total return, 1 year
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
0.40%
JNK expense ratio
0.15%
PULS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PULS costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; PULS is 3.4 times larger.

JNK vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureJNKPULS
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.7%+4.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg High Yield Very Liquid IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.9bn$19.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returns
JNK PULS
Return
Total return edge JNK +41.2% +32.2%
Annualized edge JNK +4.1% +3.3%
Price return edge PULS −14.3% −0.9%
Risk
Volatility edge PULS 10.1% 1.9%
Max drawdown edge PULS −21.4% −5.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PULS 0.18 0.27
Sortino edge PULS 0.25 0.32
Calmar edge PULS 0.19 0.57
Reading

JNK returned more: +41.2% to +32.2%. PULS swung less: 1.9% to 10.1%. PULS fell less at its worst: −5.9% to −21.4%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: JNK vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureJNKPULSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+41.2%+32.2%JNKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.1%+3.3%JNKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−14.3%−0.9%PULSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility10.1%1.9%PULSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation7.0%1.6%PULSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.4%−5.9%PULSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.180.27PULSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.250.32PULSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.190.57PULSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, JNK and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JNK PULS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in JNK
1261229 BC Ltd, due Apr 15, 2032 0.63%
Meridian Arc Holdco LLC, due Apr 30, 2031 0.56%
EchoStar Corp, due Nov 30, 2029 0.51%
PR RNO Property Owner 1 LLC, due May 1, 2031 0.48%
Cloud Software Group Inc, due Mar 31, 2029 0.41%
Quikrete Holdings Inc, due Mar 1, 2032 0.40%
DISH Network Corp, due Nov 15, 2027 0.40%
SV RNO Property Owner 1 LLC, due Mar 1, 2031 0.39%
Only in PULS
PGIM AAA CLO ETF 1.81%
Phillips 66 0% CP 22/06/2026, due Jun 22, 2026 0.83%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0% CP 17/06/2026, due Jun 17, 2026 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0% CP 01/06/2026, due Jun 1, 2026 0.66%
INTESA SANPAOLO SPA NEW YORK BRANCH 4.27% CP 30/06/2026, due Jun 30, 2026 0.63%
ABNANV 4.718 01/22/27 144A, due Jan 22, 2027 0.57%
Healthpeak Properties Inc 0% CP 24/06/2026, due Jun 24, 2026 0.52%
BX 2022-LBA6 A, due Jan 18, 2039 0.51%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +1.7% +4.0%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +3.1 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.15%
Holdings 1142 553
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.9bn $19.8bn

JNK and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-DE1F198B57

JNK and PULS do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. JNK follows Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index and PULS follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 JNK returned +1.7% and PULS +4.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

JNK and PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
JNK

JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JNK or PULS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JNK returned +1.7% and PULS +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, JNK or PULS?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JNK against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jnk-vs-puls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.