Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IXUS vs VLUE: how they differ

IXUS and VLUE hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and VLUE hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IXUS and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIXUSVLUE
ROCHE PS PAR AG0.70%0.34%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.09%0.15%
LOBLAW COMPANIES LTD0.06%0.10%
HELVETIA BALOISE HOLDING N AG0.05%0.19%
ADMIRAL GROUP PLC0.03%1.02%
BAWAG GROUP AG0.03%0.39%
EQT0.03%0.17%
KEYERA0.03%0.11%
BALFOUR BEATTY PLC0.02%0.37%
PERSEUS MINING LTD0.02%0.42%
TELENOR0.02%0.66%
BUDIMEX SA0.01%0.36%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IXUSOnly in VLUE
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49%MICRON TECHNOLOGY 21.65%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.14%
SK HYNIX 1.79%GENERAL MOTORS 3.72%
ASML HOLDING 1.55%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.05%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.84%BANK OF AMERICA 2.15%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.78%FORD MOTOR CO 1.94%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.68%COMCAST CLASS A 1.79%
SHELL PLC 0.62%HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 1.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IXUS and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore MSCI Total International StockMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.15%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%96.9%
Holdings2540148

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 44.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +22.2% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IXUS or VLUE?
IXUS charges 0.07% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IXUS and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IXUS and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IXUS against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IXUS against VLUE, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ixus-vs-vlue Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources