Which returned more over the last year, IWV or SECT?

In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +14.8% and SECT +13.1%.

Which is cheaper, IWV or SECT?

IWV is cheaper, by 0.49 percentage points a year. That is about $49 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do IWV and SECT overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 0% of SECT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Across categories

IWV vs SECT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWV returned +14.8% to SECT's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWV and SECT

Net assets: $20.2bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares Russell 3000 ETF, and $2.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Main Sector Rotation ETF.

IWV on its own →SECT on its own →

At a glance

+14.8%

IWV total return, 1 year

+13.1%

SECT total return, 1 year

0.20%

IWV expense ratio

0.69%

SECT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWV costs 0.49 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points.

IWV vs SECT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	IWV	SECT
Return
Measure	IWV	SECT
Total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+13.1%
Drawdown
Measure	IWV	SECT
Below its high		3.0%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	IWV	SECT
What it tracks	Russell 3000 Index	No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Measure	IWV	SECT
Expense ratio	0.20%	0.69%
Net assets, IWV as of Nov 3, 2026 and SECT as of Jul 31, 2026	$20.2bn	$2.8bn
Holdings
Measure	IWV	SECT
Holdings in common	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	33.1%	99.6%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and SECT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWV SECT

Only in one fund ↓

Only in IWV

NVIDIA 6.63%

APPLE 6.60%

MICROSOFT 5.33%

AMAZON.COM INC 3.35%

ALPHABET CLASS A 2.24%

BROADCOM INC 2.13%

META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.88%

ALPHABET CLASS C 1.82%

Only in SECT

SELECT SECTOR SPDR TRUST (THE) 38.39%

SELECT SECTOR SPDR TRUST (THE) 19.67%

SELECT SECTOR SPDR TRUST (THE) 12.44%

SELECT SECTOR SPDR TRUST (THE) 9.03%

INVESCO EXCHANGE-TRADED FUND TRUST II 6.08%

SELECT SECTOR SPDR TRUST (THE) 6.02%

SELECT SECTOR SPDR TRUST (THE) 4.01%

SELECT SECTOR SPDR TRUST (THE) 3.91%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares Main

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +14.8% +13.1%

Its benchmark over the same days +14.9% (VTHR) +14.8% (VOO)

Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR −1.7 pts vs VOO

Expense ratio 0.20% 0.69%

Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 0.0%

Holdings 2589 8

Net assets, IWV as of Nov 3, 2026 and SECT as of Jul 31, 2026 $20.2bn $2.8bn

IWV and SECT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,589 positions, with the top ten at 33.1%.

SECT

SECT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.69% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 99.6%. It sat 3.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or SECT?: In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +14.8% and SECT +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or SECT?: IWV is cheaper, by 0.49 percentage points a year. That is about $49 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and SECT overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 0% of SECT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

IWV vs SPHB IWV vs IYZ IWV vs SPYX IWV vs USCL OEF vs SECT SECT vs SPMO SECT vs SPHQ MTUM vs SECT

Where to next

IWV on its own →SECT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IWV dividend history →IWV holdings →SECT dividend history →SECT holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

IWV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IWV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IWV ↗

SECT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SECT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Main website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against SECT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-sect

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.