Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs VTWG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to VTWG's +8.0%; 93% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and VTWG

Net assets: $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, and $1.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+8.0%
VTWG total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.06%
VTWG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWG costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; IWO is 10.1 times larger.

IWO vs VTWG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOVTWG
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+8.0%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 20269.8%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexRussell 2000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$14.1bn$1.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common93%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%7.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returns
IWO VTWG
Return
Total return edge Tie +419.6% +418.5%
Annualized edge Tie +10.8% +10.8%
Price return edge Tie +359.8% +365.5%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 22.2% 22.2%
Max drawdown edge Tie −40.5% −40.5%
Downside capture 100.1% 99.6%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.50 0.50
Sortino edge Tie 0.73 0.73
Treynor 0.111 0.111
Calmar edge Tie 0.27 0.27
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.06 0.07
Information ratio 0.01 −0.01
Tracking error 1.5% 1.5%

Each against its own benchmark: IWO against VTWG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VTWG against IWO, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IWO and VTWG returned about the same: +419.6% and +418.5%. IWO and VTWG swung about the same: 22.2% and 22.2%. IWO and VTWG fell about the same at their worst: −40.5% and −40.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWO vs VTWG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOVTWGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+419.6%+418.5%TiePrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.8%+10.8%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+359.8%+365.5%TiePrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.2%22.2%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.3%15.3%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.5%−40.5%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.2%99.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.1%99.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.500.50TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.730.73TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1110.111Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.270.27TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVTWGIWOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.060.07Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +0.7%−0.7% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.01−0.01Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.5%1.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

93%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and VTWG hold 93% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

93% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO VTWG
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71% 0.83%
JFROG 0.74% 0.69%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68% 0.71%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66% 0.62%
GLAUKOS 0.70% 0.62%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61% 0.69%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.58% 0.56%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH 0.56% 0.57%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58% 0.56%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.57% 0.55%
TG THERAPEUTICS 0.55% 0.53%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60% 0.53%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
GENTHERM 0.05%
AKERO THERAPEUTICS CVR 0.00%
ARCELLX INC CVR 0.00%
CHINOOK THERAPEUTICS INC 0.00%
CHINOOK THERAPEUTICS INC CVR 0.00%
COHERUS ONCOLOGY INC 0.00%
FIRST CAROLINA FINANCIAL SERVICES 0.00%
GTXI INC - CVR 0.00%
Only in VTWG
SLBBH1142 1.95%
Arcosa Inc 0.14%
MKTLIQ 0.13%
ACV Auctions Inc 0.07%
Weave Communications Inc 0.03%
BioLife Solutions Inc 0.02%
Simulations Plus Inc 0.01%
BankUnited Inc 0.01%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +8.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) +7.9% (IWO)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG +0.1 pts vs IWO
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 1122 1137
Net assets, IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWG as of Sep 30, 2026 $14.0bn $1.4bn

IWO and VTWG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E4A4D96946

IWO and VTWG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Cost. IWO charges 0.24% of assets a year and VTWG 0.06%, a gap of 0.18 points.
  2. Size. IWO has $14.1bn in net assets and VTWG $1.4bn (net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026); IWO is 10.1 times larger.
  3. What each follows (similar). Both follow Russell 2000 Growth Index.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTWG

VTWG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +8.0% with distributions reinvested, against +7.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,137 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or VTWG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and VTWG +8.0%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or VTWG?
VTWG is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWO and VTWG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 0% of VTWG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against VTWG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-vtwg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.