Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to VGT's +24.7%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and VGT

Net assets: $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.8 points; VGT is 11.0 times larger.

IWO vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$14.1bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common3%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
IWO VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +546.2% +2,280.1%
Annualized edge VGT +8.5% +14.9%
Price return edge VGT +451.3% +1,863.7%
Risk
Volatility edge VGT (slight) 23.3% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge VGT (slight) −56.5% −52.4%
Downside capture 100.1% 99.9%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.39 0.68
Sortino edge VGT 0.56 0.99
Treynor 0.111 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.15 0.28
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.06 0.80
Information ratio 0.01 0.19
Tracking error 1.5% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: IWO against VTWG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +2,280.1% to +546.2%. VGT swung slightly less: 21.2% to 23.3%. VGT fell slightly less at its worst: −52.4% to −56.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWO vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+546.2%+2,280.1%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.5%+14.9%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+451.3%+1,863.7%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.3%21.2%VGT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.3%14.4%VGTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−56.5%−52.4%VGT (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.2%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.1%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.390.68VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.560.99VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1110.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.150.28VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVTWGFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.060.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +0.7%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.010.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.5%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

3%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and VGT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

3% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO VGT
JFROG 0.74% 0.08%
MAXLINEAR 0.44% 0.07%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58% 0.07%
PLEXUS CORP 0.42% 0.07%
SILICON LABORATORIES 0.49% 0.07%
COMMVAULT SYSTEMS 0.49% 0.07%
HUT CORP 0.25% 0.07%
ZETA GLOBAL HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.51% 0.07%
QUALYS 0.55% 0.06%
RIOT PLATFORMS 0.22% 0.06%
VARONIS SYSTEMS 0.38% 0.06%
IMPINJ 0.34% 0.06%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.58%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.57%
Only in VGT
NVIDIA Corp 17.58%
Apple Inc 15.91%
Microsoft Corp 11.16%
Micron Technology Inc 4.45%
Broadcom Inc 4.11%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.67%
Intel Corp 1.98%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 86.8%
Holdings 1122 320
Net assets, IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $14.0bn $154.5bn

IWO and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B0DA0EA98A

IWO and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWO follows Russell 2000 Growth Index and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 3% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWO returned +7.9% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWO and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.