Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWN vs SLYV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWN returned +21.1% to SLYV's +19.2%; 41% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWN and SLYV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF and $4.8bn for State Street SPDR S & P 600 Small Cap Value ETF.

At a glance
+21.1%
IWN total return, 1 year
+19.2%
SLYV total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWN expense ratio
0.15%
SLYV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SLYV costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.9 points; IWN is 2.9 times larger.

IWN vs SLYV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWNSLYV
Return
Total return, 1 year+21.1%+19.2%
Drawdown
Below its high5.2%, high on Aug 14, 20265.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Value IndexS&P SmallCap 600 Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$14.0bn$4.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common41%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%8.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,358 weekly returns
IWN SLYV
Return
Total return edge SLYV +910.2% +1,264.3%
Annualized edge SLYV +9.3% +10.5%
Price return edge IWN (slight) +518.0% +501.7%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 22.3% 22.4%
Max drawdown edge Tie −60.6% −60.9%
Downside capture 100.2% 97.0%
Beta 1.00 0.96
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SLYV 0.43 0.48
Sortino edge SLYV 0.62 0.69
Treynor 0.102 0.112
Calmar edge SLYV 0.15 0.17
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +1.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.09 1.12
Information ratio −0.01 0.14
Tracking error 2.3% 5.1%

Each against its own benchmark: IWN against VTWV, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; SLYV against IJS, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SLYV returned more: +1,264.3% to +910.2%. IWN and SLYV swung about the same: 22.3% and 22.4%. IWN and SLYV fell about the same at their worst: −60.6% and −60.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWN vs SLYV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWNSLYVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+910.2%+1,264.3%SLYVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.3%+10.5%SLYVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+518.0%+501.7%IWN (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%22.4%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%15.5%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−60.6%−60.9%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.2%94.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.2%97.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.000.96Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.990.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.430.48SLYVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.620.69SLYVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1020.112Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.150.17SLYVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVTWVIJSThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+1.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.091.12Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.2% to +1.1%−0.8% to +3.0%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.010.14Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error2.3%5.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,358 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

41%

By the books each fund has filed, IWN and SLYV hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

41% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWN SLYV
SM ENERGY 0.60% 1.01%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.59% 0.91%
MATSON INC 0.47% 0.75%
ATLANTIC UNION BANKSHARES 0.38% 0.61%
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES INC 0.36% 0.57%
MACERICH REIT 0.47% 0.35%
RXO INC 0.31% 0.52%
PATTERSON UTI ENERGY INC 0.30% 0.51%
EASTERN BANKSHARES INC 0.30% 0.52%
SIGNET JEWELERS 0.30% 0.49%
CRESCENT ENERGY CLASS A 0.30% 0.49%
FULTON FINANCIAL 0.30% 0.49%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWN
UMB FINANCIAL 0.61%
VIASAT INC 0.60%
CARETRUST REIT 0.58%
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP 0.52%
CYTOKINETICS 0.49%
PBF ENERGY CLASS A 0.49%
SOUTHWEST GAS HOLDINGS 0.46%
UNITED BANKSHARES 0.44%
Only in SLYV
PAYCOM SOFTWARE INC 1.09%
MATCH GROUP INC 1.09%
CARMAX INC 0.83%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO 0.82%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS INC 0.80%
VICTORIA S SECRET + CO 0.79%
POOL CORP 0.77%
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP 0.75%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF SLYV State Street SPDR S & P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +21.1% +19.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +21.3% (VTWV) +19.3% (IJS)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWV −0.1 pts vs IJS
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 1405 464
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $14.0bn $4.8bn

IWN and SLYV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7F6A2E832A

IWN and SLYV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IWN follows Russell 2000 Value Index and SLYV follows S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 41% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. Number of holdings. IWN holds 1,405 positions and SLYV holds 464.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWN and SLYV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWN

IWN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.1% with distributions reinvested, against +21.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,405 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SLYV

SLYV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +19.3% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 464 positions, with the top ten at 8.9%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWN or SLYV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWN returned +21.1% and SLYV +19.2%.
Which is cheaper, IWN or SLYV?
SLYV is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWN and SLYV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWN and 0% of SLYV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWN against SLYV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwn-vs-slyv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.