Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs VTEB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to VTEB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and VTEB

Net assets: $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF, and $49.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
−0.4%
VTEB total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.03%
VTEB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTEB costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points; IWM is 1.6 times larger.

IWM vs VTEB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMVTEB
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%−0.4%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexS&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$78.0bn$49.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and VTEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWM VTEB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
Only in VTEB
Vanguard Municipal Low Duration Fund 0.69%
State of California 0.15%
State of California 0.14%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.13%
State of Illinois 0.12%
Ohio State University 0.12%
City of New York NY 0.10%
State of Wisconsin 0.10%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Tracks an index of Tax-Exempt Bond
Total return, 1 year +14.1% −0.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO not measured
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.03%
Holdings 1977 11155
Net assets, IWM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTEB as of Sep 30, 2026 $75.5bn $49.6bn

IWM and VTEB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTEB

VTEB tracks an index of Tax-Exempt Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VTEB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and VTEB −0.4%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or VTEB?
VTEB is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against VTEB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-vteb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.