Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWF vs VB: how they differ
IWF and VB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWF | Only in VB |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 15.46% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55% |
| APPLE 7.77% | Jabil Inc 0.49% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% | REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46% |
| MICROSOFT 5.55% | Astera Labs Inc 0.45% |
| BROADCOM INC 5.10% | Natera Inc 0.45% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% | EMCOR Group Inc 0.45% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% | Twilio Inc 0.38% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% | NRG Energy Inc 0.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | VB Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Russell 1000 growth | Small-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | +15.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | −2.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 93.6% | 21.7% |
| Holdings | 315 | 1311 |
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VB in plain words
VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or VB?
- IWF charges 0.18% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWF and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against VB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources