Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 61% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and ONEQ
Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWF costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.8 points; IWF is 11.7 times larger.
| Measure | IWF | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $127.7bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 61% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | 56.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and ONEQ hold 61% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
61% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF and ONEQ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and ONEQ follows Nasdaq Composite Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWF returned +0.9% and ONEQ +12.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.8 points.
- Size. IWF has $127.7bn in net assets and ONEQ $10.9bn (net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026); IWF is 11.7 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or ONEQ?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-oneq
[IWF against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.