Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWF vs ONEQ: how they differ
IWF and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWF | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 15.46% | NVIDIA CORP 11.24% |
| APPLE 7.77% | APPLE INC 10.04% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% | MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% |
| MICROSOFT 5.55% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% |
| BROADCOM INC 5.10% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% | BROADCOM INC 4.64% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Russell 1000 growth | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 93.6% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 315 | 1022 |
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or ONEQ?
- IWF charges 0.18% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWF and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against ONEQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-oneq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources