Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWD vs IXUS: how they differ

IWD and IXUS hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and IXUS hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWD and IXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWDIXUS
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES0.11%0.70%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.13%0.09%
DTE ENERGY0.08%0.26%
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP0.07%0.14%
PPL CORP0.07%0.06%
ALLSTATE CORP0.17%0.05%
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC0.09%0.05%
ESTEE LAUDER INC CLASS A0.05%0.11%
LOEWS0.05%0.06%
TRACTOR SUPPLY0.05%0.09%
MERCK & CO INC0.96%0.04%
RB GLOBAL0.04%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWDOnly in IXUS
AMAZON.COM INC 6.04%TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49%
APPLE 5.83%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21%
MICROSOFT 4.93%SK HYNIX 1.79%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.54%ASML HOLDING 1.55%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.54%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.84%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.85%TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.78%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.73%ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.68%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.23%SHELL PLC 0.62%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IWD and IXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isRussell 1000 valueCore MSCI Total International Stock
Total return, 1 year+27.4%+22.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+9.9 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%0.0%
Holdings8142540

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 814 positions, with the top ten at 29.0%.

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or IXUS?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWD or IXUS?
IWD charges 0.18% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWD against IXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against IXUS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-ixus Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources