Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWC vs SLYG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWC returned +16.5% to SLYG's +15.6%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWC and SLYG
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.2bn for iShares Micro-Cap ETF and $4.7bn for State Street SPDR S & P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SLYG costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; SLYG is 3.9 times larger.
| Measure | IWC | SLYG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.5% | +15.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 8.2%, high on Aug 4, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell Microcap Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.2bn | $4.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 5.9% | 9.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Aug 26, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,104 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: IWC against IWV, Aug 26, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026; SLYG against IJT, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.
SLYG returned more: +658.6% to +348.0%. SLYG swung slightly less: 22.4% to 23.7%. SLYG fell slightly less at its worst: −59.3% to −63.8%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWC | SLYG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +348.0% | +658.6% | SLYG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +7.3% | +10.0% | SLYG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +254.5% | +453.1% | SLYG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 23.7% | 22.4% | SLYG (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 16.8% | 15.6% | SLYG (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −63.8% | −59.3% | SLYG (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 118.0% | 99.9% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 111.7% | 101.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.16 | 1.01 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.76 | 0.92 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.34 | 0.46 | SLYG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.48 | 0.66 | SLYG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.070 | 0.082 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.11 | 0.17 | SLYG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IWV | IJT | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −3.6% a year | −1.3% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −1.41 | −1.04 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −8.5% to +1.4% | −3.9% to +1.2% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.16 | −0.19 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 12.0% | 6.6% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,104 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWC and SLYG hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
2% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWC and SLYG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWC and SLYG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IWC follows Russell Microcap Index and SLYG follows S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 2% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- Number of holdings. IWC holds 1,365 positions and SLYG holds 350.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SLYG
SLYG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 350 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 8.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or SLYG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +16.5% and SLYG +15.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWC or SLYG?
- SLYG is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWC against SLYG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-slyg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWC against SLYG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-slyg
[IWC against SLYG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-slyg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.