Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VCSH?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and VCSH returned +1.6%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWB or VCSH?

IWB charges 0.15% a year and VCSH charges 0.03%, so VCSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs VCSH: how they differ

IWB and VCSH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VCSH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWB	Only in VCSH
NVIDIA 7.26%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.85%
APPLE 6.73%	Bank of America Corp 0.24%
MICROSOFT 5.21%	AbbVie Inc 0.21%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.49%	CVS Health Corp 0.21%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77%	T-Mobile USA Inc 0.20%
BROADCOM INC 2.40%	Boeing Co/The 0.20%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24%	Wells Fargo & Co 0.18%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02%	JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

IWB and VCSH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Russell 1000	Short-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+16.7%	+1.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.8 pts	−15.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.03%
Holdings	945	2999

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

VCSH in plain words

VCSH is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VCSH?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and VCSH returned +1.6%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VCSH?: IWB charges 0.15% a year and VCSH charges 0.03%, so VCSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against VCSH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against VCSH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-vcsh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources