Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWB vs VCSH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to VCSH's +1.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWB and VCSH

Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $43.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+13.1%
IWB total return, 1 year
+1.3%
VCSH total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.03%
VCSH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCSH costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.8 points; IWB is 1.1 times larger.

IWB vs VCSH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWBVCSH
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+1.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexBloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$48.6bn$43.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VCSH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWB VCSH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWB
NVIDIA 7.15%
APPLE 7.06%
MICROSOFT 5.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.46%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.63%
BROADCOM INC 2.24%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.92%
Only in VCSH
MKTLIQ 0.68%
Bank of America Corp 0.23%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.22%
CVS Health Corp 0.20%
AbbVie Inc 0.20%
Amazon.com Inc 0.19%
Boeing Co 0.19%
T-Mobile USA Inc 0.19%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index of Short-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +1.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.2% (VONE) +1.3% (SCHJ)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE 0.0 pts vs SCHJ
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Holdings 1025 3064
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 and VCSH as of Sep 30, 2026 $49.1bn $43.9bn

IWB and VCSH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.

VCSH

VCSH tracks an index of Short-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VCSH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and VCSH +1.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VCSH?
VCSH is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against VCSH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-vcsh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.